Wednesday, 17 December 2014

Brecht assignment - rob

Jade Ward McFarlane
"Ready Brecht"
Play title - 'Fear and Misery of the Third Reich'




In this assignment I will be discussing Brecht's background political issues in this period and rehearsals.


Bertolt Brecht ( 1898-1956 ) was a German playwright and poet . He wrote political poetry and had a keen interest in socialism and it's theories, he was extremely interested in Karl Marx's theory of Socialism which involved social justice, This theory was about the rich and poor, who had money and who didn't, and how this made people gain power and who had control of society. I personally think Brecht wanted to do something about this theory and make it more 'seen' by putting it in his plays; showing the audience bluntly what was going on in the real world, through basic scenes with messages.


Brecht's used 'Epic Theatre'. Epic theatre is a reaction against popular forms of theatre in this time period mainly the naturalistic, it was a theatrical movement in the early to mid-20th century, even though Epic theatre had been around years before, Brecht brought this back to life in shows. He completely went off of Stanislavski's wave length of being naturalistic and playing 'melodrama'. Brecht was against Stanislavski's methodology and wanted 'Realism' bringing social and political focus in his plays rather than emotionally connecting with the audience he wanted to "Hit the nail on the head".


One of his famous techniques were "Verfremdungseffekt" or in other words "Alienation Effect"  this technique was to make the audience feel not connected in the action of the play, so they do not become connected to what was going on in the scene or become overly attached to the character. he would put bright lights in the theatre (not just the stage),  also having actors play multiple characters. Having actors also rearrange the set in full view of the audience and "breaking the fourth wall" by speaking to the audience are all ways he used to achieve the Alienation Effect.


Another technique would be 'Gestus'

Gestus is an acting technique developed by the German theatre practitioner Bertolt Brecht. It carries the sense of a combination of physical gestures and "gist" or attitude. It is a means by which "an attitude or single aspect of an attitude" is revealed, insofar as it is "expressible in words or actions.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestus

In other words the technique Gestus means the characters attitude is revealed straight away through actions or words rather than subliminally/ making the audience think about what they're really saying; it is a 'blunt' approach a theme that is continuously used through Berchts plays. Again completely different style to Stanislavski.

'The black shoes'
The play 'fear and misery of the third reach' is about ordinary life under the narzi's; how citizens were feeling defiance, secrecy, suspicion, anxiety, denial, violence, fear and dread. Shown through short scenes with other actors sitting on stage and bringing on and off props while the show is still seen to the audiences eye. I think Brecht decided to do this as he wanted to show the audience that nothing was a lie, including the 'on and off exits' the stories were real and the issues was real. Nothing was set up.

The scene 'The black shoes' is a quick scene between mother and child in a low class house. The young girl enters to her mum peeling potatoes for dinner 'again' the young girl begins to brag about a girls campsite run by hitler 'The hitter youth club' and how amazing it was and that she really wanted to go pleading for some 'pfennings' (money used back then) to return. Her mum begins to interrogate the daughter about what happens at the camp, (going back to the theme suspicion and anxiety) she then avoids the daughters comments only to be thrown with another question about 'the black shoes' with wholes in. Bluntly showing the difference in classes and how poor they really were.

I played the mother in the scene, I personally feel the mother was very insecure about her daughter going to this youth comitee, as she starts questioning her; scene 11 - line 14 "didn't she have some work to do to?" Interrogating what happens at the camp undercoverly when the subject is changed to the black shoes with holes in the mother asks "what's wrong with the welfare pair" the daughter then says back "they look clumsy" the mother then says how she will get the old pair resoled, bluntly showing she does have money to send her daughter to camp as getting shoes resoled was very expensive back then also explained by the daughter in scene 11 - line 25 "that's so expensive".
Going back to the theme 'blunt' the mother secretly doesn't want her daughter to go to camp and pretends she does not have the money but can afford to get her daughters shoes repaired even though she has others, the daughter in denial (another theme) about her mum not wanting her to go. This is clear to audience to see has no subliminal messages behind it. 

During rehearsals I felt as if the play was not my suited style, I didn't feel as though I could express myself properly through the play and kind of felt hopeless in the sense how short and slightly boring I felt the scene was. I found it difficult to understand what was really going on even though brechts theme is 'blunt' and found it hard to learn lines as I didn't really connect with the scene as much as I have with other plays. I found brechts Stylism slightly strange with having other actors on stage when scenes are being performed as I felt it took away the whole 'magicness' of theatre. However I did enjoy learning about brechts theories and his Stylism even though I didn't enjoy doing it as such. I learnt that even though I didn't agree with it, it was still understandable to the audience and had a different approach to the average layout that theatre is normally performed in. 

Conclusion
Overall I didn't enjoy working on this play as I didn't understand brechts Stylism. However I appreciate Learning about it as knowledge is the key to being a successful actor, and I can now take this knowledge with me in futher references if needed. 

(Actor playing Hitler)
(Actors playing mother and daughter in the black shoes scene)

Accidental death of an anarchist. Rob

In this assigment I have been looking at the classic performance ‘Accidental Death of an Anarchist’ By Dario Fo. A comedic play portraying some of his concerns and issues with the police, society and institiutions. A major Theme in this play has to be ‘Power’ This occurs when a person with higher status enters the scene and shows power through negativity e.g. shouting.
The play is based on the real-life events surrounding Italian railroad worker and anarchist Giuseppe Pinelli, who fell  or was thrown to his death from the fourth floor window of a Milan police station in 1969. Pinelli was accused of bombing a bank (the Piazza Fontana bombing) but was cleared of the charge.

 

Here is a short summary of what happens in the play.
The events of the play itself, however, are fictional. The play opens with Inspector Bertozzo interrogating The Maniac on the third floor of the police station. The Maniac constantly outsmarts the dim-witted Bertozzo and, when Bertozzo leaves the room, intercepts a phone call from Inspector Pissani. The phone call lets the Maniac know that a judge is due at the police station to investigate the interrogation and death of the anarchist. The Maniac decides to impersonate the judge, and successfully does so. He gets the police to re-enact the events, in the actual fourth floor room, and also involves a woman Journalist who is trying to probe the events. The play ends with two alternative endings, one with Feletti (the Journalist) leaving the four policemen to be bombed and in the second, Feletti uncuffs the men who in turn handcuff her to the window frame leaving her to die. The Maniac then leaves the audience to decide which ending they prefer.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accidental_Death_of_an_Anarchist

 

crisis’s in the 1970s england

• Following the miners' strike against its incomes policy Edward Heath's Conservative government loses the 1974 general election
• By spring of 1975 unemployment has climbed to 1 million - over 5% of the workforce
• In 1978 in an effort to tackle inflation James Callaghan's Labour government tries to persuade trade unions to limit pay rises to no more than 5% - the unions refuse and Britain is hit by a wave of strikes
• In 1979 the Conservatives win a general election and Margaret Thatcher becomes Britain's first woman prime minister

Crisis’s in the 1970s Italy

• The period or the late 1960 - 1970s came to be known as the Opposti Estremismi, (from left-wing and right-wing extremists riots), later renamed anni di piombo ("years of lead") because of a wave of bombings and shootings — the first victim of this period was Antonio Annarumma, a policeman, killed on November 12, 1969 in Milan during a left-wing demonstration.
• In December, four bombings struck in Rome the Monument of Vittorio Emanuele II (Altare della Patria). The later bombing, known as the Piazza Fontana bombing of 12 December 1969, killed 16 and injured 90.
• On May 17, 1972, police officer Luigi Calabresi, who was awarded a gold medal of the Italian Republic for civil valour, was assassinated in Milan. Sixteen years later.
• During a ceremony in honour of Luigi Calabresi on 17 May 1973, where the Interior Minister Mariano Rumor was present, an anarchist, Gianfranco Bertoli, threw a bomb killing four and injuring 45.
• Feminist demonstrations for equal rights against goverment.

http://mondediplo.com/1998/09/11negri  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Italian_Republic#The_1970s:_Strategy_of_tension_and_Years_of_lead

My opinion on Dario Fo writing this piece was a mirror on his own thoughts about what was going on in the 1970s and how politics had literally been turnt upside down and made serious issues into a joke to not only brighten up everyone but to undercoverly inlight them on what is going on his comedic approach mocks the parliment and authority showing how much he respected their decisions by using characters like the maniac to demonstrate himself and also using extremely similar statements in the play about the exact crisis’s going on.

In theatre, a farce is a comedy which aims to entertain the audience by means of unlikely, extravagant, and improbable situations, disguise and mistaken identity, verbal humour of varying degrees of sophistication, which may include sexual innuendo and word play, and a fast-paced plot whose speed usually increases, culminating in an ending which often involves an elaborate chase scene. Farce is also characterized by physical humor, the use of deliberate absurdity or nonsense, and broadly stylized performances.

https://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Farce.html

Satire is a genre of literature, and sometimes graphic and performing arts, in which vices, follies, abuses, and shortcomings are held up to ridicule, ideally with the intent of shaming individuals, corporations, government or society itself, into improvement. Although satire is usually meant to be humorous, its greater purpose is often constructive social criticism, using wit as a weapon and as a tool to draw attention to both particular and wider issues in society.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satire

Dario Fo uses both farce and satire styles in his play he uses farce stylism to take a comedic approach to his audience so its funny but not so hard hitting but also to not get in trouble by the goverement as hes seemling making a ‘joke’.
Dario Fo uses a satire stylisim in his play to demonstrate the issues of what was happening in the 1970’s in italy and how disgusted he and society are shaming the goverment system in the play sarcastically and ‘witiful’.

I play the maniac who is a extremely intelligent man who doesn’t get the respect he deserves so claims his name and ends up being a crazy witty man who plays with the authorities mind. He decides to change his disguise when he later realises that is the only way he will gain power “my god the judge” quoted from scene two, Act one pg 11 shows how status means a lot to gain respect and the difference between status and classes in the 1970’s
For example: In Act One, Scene Two, the superintendent didn't realise that he was a talking to the 'judge' but his tone of voice immediatley changes and respect is gained "we were expecting you your honor” The Maniac constantly changes his character in the play, representing the deception and disguise of the police force and emphasizing how ridiculous those in power are. In Act One, Scene Two, the Maniac says, “I’m not pushing. You've been seized by a raptus." This is a great comic line and adds to the comedy.

I really enjoyed playing the manaic as he was a crazy man who I could really play with; different voices, animal characteristics and just portray things that are out of the ordinary In this character however had some difficulties in learning the lines and what each line symbolised in the manaics attack on the police.

Some of the words i came across which i didn’t know was...

anarchist -  anarchists are people who want to live under their own authority. political authority is what they are against, and some will go to extreme measures. anarchists are extremely peaceful, but when time comes to take action they go right ahead. they are anti-consumeristic and often times grow their own food. anarchism these days is often found in youth, particularly people around the punk rock scene. anarchists are not people who make bombs etc.

Raptus  a re-occurance in something

Jesuit - a member of the Society of Jesus, a Roman Catholic order of priests founded by St Ignatius Loyola, St Francis Xavier, and others in 1534, to do missionary work. The order was zealous in opposing the Reformation. Despite periodic persecution it has retained an important influence in Catholic thought and education.

I researched into these words and after this really understood what was going on in the play linking the political crisis in the 1970’s in italy. An anarchist was trying to do a peaceful demonstration to the police then ended up being thrown out the window by them (not very peaceful approach) then denying it to a higher status the ‘Judge’ (maniac) who knew what had happened and was investigating the police who was at that moment on edge and not ready for what was about to happen.

 

To conclude I really enjoyed working on this play learning about society in Italy in the 1970’s and how it shaped their future country today, I loved the character I was chosen to play he’s crazyness and the plays crazyness altogether leaves me with great knowledge on how to play a political play in a sarcastic comedic approach.

 

 

Acting Cv - Rob

Jade Ward Mcfarlane

Contact Direct: 07415267426

Email: jademcward@gmail.com

 

PERSONAL STATS

 

D.O.B.  16/10/1996       Height 5.7        

 

Eyes: Light Brown           Hair: Brown             Build:Medium               Playing Age: 15-19 yrs

 

TRAINING

 

GCSE Acting

 

Eastlea Community School

 

2008 – 2013 

2-Year Btec L3 Qualification acting

Westminster Kingsway College

2014 - 2015

Youth Member

Theatre Royal Stratford East

2009 - 2013

 

 

 

 

THEATRE EXPERIENCE

 

Year

Role

Production

Director

Company

2002

Homeless child

Oliver Twist

  -

Deborah Day 

2006

Skeleton

Magic Flute

 -

Barking and Dagenham Theatre

2009

Oedipus

chorus

Oge Eke

Eastlea Theatre Company

2010

Crazy Wife

Pandoras Box

Karlos Coleman

Theatre Royal

2011

2011

Judge

 

Protesstor

Chaucasian Chalk Circle

 

The Riots

Oge Eke

 

Karlos Coleman

Eastlea Theatre Company

Theatre Royal 

2012

Rose Eastend Child

When Chaplin met Ghandi

Matthew Xia

Eastlea Theatre Company & Olympics

2013

scphizophrena

My name is John

Jade Ward Mcfarlane

Eastlea Theatre company

2014

Essex Girl Train passenger young teen

C2C train production

Karlos Coleman

Theatre Royal

2014

Puck

Midsummers Night Dream

Rob Alexander 

Westminster Kingsway

2014

Rose Solitary Confidment Victim

On my own

Naomi

Donmar Warehouse

 

FILM & TELEVISION EXPERIENCE

 

Year

Role

Production

Director

Company

2010

School Girl

Newhams Young Mayor Documentary

BBC One

Cbbc

2013

School Girl

My Murder

BBC Three

BBC Three

 

 

ACCENTS

East End, Street Accent.

SKILLS

Good Strong High voice Projecting/Actor A* GCSE and BTEC L3/Dancer (Contempoary)Distinction Qualification and Merit Certificate, Qualified Swimmer.

PERSONAL INTERESTS

Swimming, Dancing, Acting, Dog Walking and socialising with friends and family.

Pros and cons - Rob

Pros and Cons for Higher education.

PROS 

• The most-measured benefit of higher education is of course graduate salaries, and the report confirms that higher levels of education do result in higher earning power. It cites research by Greenstone and Looney (2011) of the Brookings Institution’s Hamilton Project, which says: “On average, the benefits of a four-year college degree are equivalent to an investment that returns 15.2% per year.”
• This earnings gap increases with higher levels of degree, and also with age. The gap between those with a bachelor’s degree and those with a high school education increases from 54% for 25 to 29-year-olds to 86% for 45 to 49-year-olds.
• The benefits of higher education also extend to the chances of being employed in the first place. Unemployment rates for four-year college graduates in the US fell from 4.7% in 2010 to 4.0% in 2012, while for high school graduates the equivalent figures were 10.3% in 2010 and 8.3% in 2012.
• benefits of higher education incorporate significant contributions to society, with higher educated workers typically paying more tax.
• Higher educated people more likely to sustain jobs such as doctors, police etc. Which contributes to lives of many in society
• Apparently those with a college education are more likely to live healthier lifestyles, with fewer incidences of smoking and obesity. The gap between smoking rates of those with high school diplomas and those with four-year degrees has risen from 2 percentage points in 1962 to 17 points in 2012.
• On average, the more you learn the more you earn
• More and more jobs require college degrees.
• Higher education graduates are more likely to have health insurance and retirement plans.70% of college graduates had access to employer-provided health insurance compared to 50% of high school graduates in 2008

CONS

• Student loan debt is crippling for college graduates. Between 2003 and 2012 the number of 25-year-olds with student debt increased from 25% to 43%, and their average loan balance was $20,326 in 2012--a 91% increase since 2003.
• Student loan debt often forces college graduates to live with their parents and delay marriage, financial independence, and other adult milestones.
• Many college graduates are employed in jobs that do not require University degrees.According to the Department of Labor, as of 2008, 17 million college graduates were in positions that did not require a college education.
• Many recent Higher education graduates are un- or underemployed. In 2011 50% of college graduates under 25 years old had no job or a part-time job.The unemployment rate for recent college graduates was 8.8% in Feb. 2013, down from 10.4% in 2010
• College stress can lead to health problems and other negative consequences. 40.2% of college students reported feeling "frequently overwhelmed" in a 2012 survey about stress levels. According to the University of Florida’s Counseling & Wellness Center, "The competition for grades, the need to perform, relationships, fear of AIDS, career choice, and many other aspects of the college environment cause stress." According to the Director of Student Health Services at Biola University, college stress can lead to "headaches, weight gain, chronic digestive disorders, fatigue, increases in blood pressure, insomnia, teeth grinding in sleep, general irritability, reoccurring feeling of hopelessness, depression and anxiety and low self-esteem."

 

Conclusion
After going into depth with reasearch on pros and cons of higher education I have came up with the final conclusion for myself that higher education is the way forward. I believe that it is evidently clear that there is more benefits with higher education than without however you can still achieve well without it and will still have negative outbursts with having higher education but overall will have a better outcome.